Improving Pancasila Education Learning Outcomes through the Example Non-Example Model in Grade III SDN 40 Sei Lareh Padang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59211/mjpjetl.v4i1.220Keywords:
Example Non Example; Learning outcomes; Pancasila Education; Classroom Action Research; Elementary schoolAbstract
This study aimed to improve students’ learning outcomes in Pancasila Education through the implementation of the Example Non Example learning model. The background of this study was the low learning outcomes, activeness, and participation of Grade III students in the learning process at SDN 40 Sei Lareh, Padang City. This research employed Classroom Action Research (CAR) using qualitative and quantitative approaches. The study was conducted in two cycles, each consisting of planning, implementation, observation, and reflection stages. The subjects of this study were the teacher and 26 Grade III students of SDN 40 Sei Lareh, consisting of 13 male students and 13 female students, during the second semester of the 2025/2026 academic year. Data were collected through observation, documentation, interviews, and learning outcome evaluations. The results showed that students’ average learning outcomes improved from 64.1 in the pre-action stage to 75 in Cycle I and increased further to 88.24 in Cycle II. In addition, teacher and student activities also improved significantly and reached a very good category. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Example Non Example learning model effectively improved students’ activeness and learning outcomes in Pancasila Education.
Downloads
References
[1] E. Elisa, “Pengertian Kurikulum Menurut Beberapa Ahli.Educhannel.”
[2] F. Jannah, T. Irtifa, and P. Fatimattus Az Zahra, “Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar2022.4(2),55–65.”
[3] Nurkhliza, G. Nida, E. Purwati, A. Ferdian, and O. Wulandari, “Analysis of Student Character Education in Citizenship Education Learning at SDN Bumi Agung Lamandau.” [Online]. Available: https://journal.umpr.ac.id/index.php/pedagogik/article/view/5884.
[4] Sutrisno and A. Wibowo, Pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan berbasis pengalaman belajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
[5] T. Septiana, “Tantangan dan kendala pelaksanaan Pendidikan Pancasila dalam Kurikulum Merdeka,” Educatus, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 37–43.
[6] O. Friskilia and H. Winata, “Regulasi Diri (Pengaturan Diri) Sebagai Determinan Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan,” J. Pendidik. Manaj. Perkantoran, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 184.
[7] N. Hendracipta, “Model - Model Pembelajaran SD (T.”
[8] N. Hidayah, H. Hizriani, and K. Kadariyah, “Kesiapan guru dalam menyusun perencanaan pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan efektivitas proses belajar,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 145–156.
[9] Kemendikdasmen, “Pembelajaran Mendalam. NASKAH AKADEMIK PEMBELAJARAN MENDALAM Menuju Pendidikan Bermutu Untuk Semua.”
[10] R. F. Putera and M. Habibi, “Sosialisasi Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka Bagi Guru Kesetaraan di SKB 2 Sungai Tarab,” J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23–28, [Online]. Available: http://e-journal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jippsd
[11] Y. Anita, S. Ahmad, Y. Helsa, and A. K. Kenedi, “Pelatihan pengembangan bahan ajar digital berbasis HOTS sebagai bentuk pembelajaran di era revolusi industri 4.0 untuk guru sekolah dasar,” Dedication J. Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 59–68.
[12] R. Rahman and R. Reinita, “Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila di Kelas V Sekolah Dasar,” Ideguru J. Karya Ilm. Guru, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 113–119.
[13] D. P. Sari and R. A. Putra, “Penerapan model pembelajaran Example Non Example untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik sekolah dasar,” J. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 145–154.
[14] S. Nurhasanah, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran Example Non Example terhadap keaktifan dan hasil belajar peserta didik,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Guru Sekol. Dasar, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 33–42.
[15] Daryanto, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Penelitian Tindakan Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Gava Media.
[16] D. Rosyada, Penelitian Kualitatif Untuk Ilmu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
[17] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
[18] A. Prihantoro and F. Hidayat, “Ulumuddin: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman Melakukan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas,” Ulumuddin J. ilmuilmu Keislam., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 49–60.
[19] K. Pendidikan, R. Kebudayaan, and Teknologi, “Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen: Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini,” in Pendidikan Dasar, dan Menengah. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
URN
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aisha Dewi Andjarmi.A, Etri Wahyuni, Reinita, Desyandri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. Authors are responsible for ensuring that any third-party materials included in their work have proper permissions.
