A Study of the Scientific Literacy Profile of Prospective Biology Teachers in Papua
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59211/mjpjetl.v4i1.226Keywords:
21st-century education, Scientific literacy, TOSLS, prospective Biology teachersAbstract
21st-century education requires teachers to master various skills in order to face the challenges of globalization, one of which is scientific literacy skills. This study aims to describe the scientific literacy profile of Biology Education students at Cenderawasih University as prospective Biology teachers in Papua. The research was conducted from June to July 2025. A quantitative method with a descriptive approach was employed. The sample consisted of 48 students selected using a convenience sampling technique. The instrument used was the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS). The data were analyzed descriptively through percentage calculations and categorization of scientific literacy levels. The results showed that, overall, the students’ scientific literacy abilities fall into the low category. These findings indicate the need for strategies to improve scientific literacy through innovative learning, strengthening inquiry-based activities, and utilizing contextual digital learning resources. This research is expected to serve as a foundation for the development of scientific literacy enhancement programs within the Biology Education Department at Cenderawasih University.
Downloads
References
[1]. Listiani, H., Nurbaya, N., & Satar, S. (2025). Identifikasi Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas XI SMA YPK Diaspora Kotaraja. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(01), 2477–2143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i01.22223
[2]. Yuliati, Y. (2017). LITERASI SAINS DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPA. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 3(2), 21–28.
[3]. Fortus, D., Lin, J., Neumann, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2022). The role of affect in science literacy for all. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 535–555.
[4]. Moiyo, Y., Buhungo, T. J., & Abdjul, T. (2024). Analisis Keefektifan Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Berbantuan Video Pembelajaran Materi Fluida Statis. Jurnal Jendela Pendidikan, 4(02), https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v4i02.714
[5]. Wahab, M. N. N. D., Wasis, & Yuliani. (2024). The Effectiveness of Scientific Literacy Based Learning Device to Improve Junior High School Students Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(9), 6405–6414. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8573
[6]. Pradini, N. L., Rahmad Wijaya, B., Jannah, A. N., Studi, P., Guru, P., & Dasar, S. (2022). Analisis Literasi Sains dalam Upaya Implementasi Pendidikan Abad 21. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.56480/eductum
[7]. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I dan Volume II): Factsheets-Indonesia. Paris: OECD Publishing.
[8]. Siregar, T. R. A., Iskandar, W., & Rokhimawan, M. A. (2020). Literasi Sains Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik pada Pembelajaran IPA SD/MI di Abad 21. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 7(2), 243–257.
[9]. Irsan, I. (2021). Implemensi Literasi Sains dalam Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 5631–5639. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1682
[10]. Fadilah, F., Isti, S., Amarta, T. W. D., & Prabowo, C. A. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMA pada Pembelajaran Biologi Menggunakan NOSLiT. Jurnal BIOEDUIN : Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, 10(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.15575/bioeduin.v10i1.8141
[11]. Kamelia, Ibrahim, & Adhani, A. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas X di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi Menggunakan NoSLiT. BJBE Borneo Journal Of Biology Education, 4(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35334/bjbe.v4i1.2546
[12]. Listiani, H., Satar, S., Nurbaya, N., & Akobiarek, M. (2024). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains (Scientific Literacy) Siswa Kelas X SMA YPK Diaspora Kotaraja, Papua. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 9(4), 767–778. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i4.18952
[13]. [Listiani, H., Satar, S., Nurbaya, N., Ledoh, C. C., & Upuya, B. B. (2025). Literasi sains pelajar papua: profil kemampuan siswa kelas X SMA YPPK Teruna Bakti dalam konteks pendidikan abad 21. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(3), 267–276.
[14]. Takda, A., Arifin, K., & Tahang, L. (2023). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik SMA Berdasarkan Nature Of Science Literacy Test (NoSLiT). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.36709/jipfi.v8i1.7
[15]. Utama, M. N., Ramadhani, R., Rohmani, S. N., & Prayitno, B. A. (2019). Profil Keterampilan Literasi Sains Siswa di Salah Satu Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) Negeri di Surakarta. Didaktika Biologi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi, 3(2), 57–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3 2502/dikbio.v3i2.1296
[16]. Almeida, B., Santos, M., & Justi, R. (2023). Aspects and Abilities of Science Literacy in the Context of Nature of Science Teaching. Science & Education, 32(3), 567–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191- 022-00324-4
[17]. Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. (2011).Membangun literasi sains peserta didik. Bandung: Humaniora.
[18]. Ustun, U., Cansiz, M., Ozdemir, E., & Cansiz, N. (2022). Student and school-level factors to predict science literacy for two top-performing countries in PISA 2015: Finland and Singapore. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 579–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2037167
[19]. Fauziah, N., Ningsyih, S., Khusaini, F., Guru, P., Dasar, S., Taman, S., Bima, S., & Bima, I. (2024). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidkan Guru Sekolah Dasar Pada Mata Kuliah Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup : Sebuah Studi Pendahuluan. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.6971
[20]. Ramdani, A., Jufri, A. W., Gunawan, Fahrurrozi, M., & Yustiqvar, M. (2021). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skills in terms of gender using science teaching materials based on the 5e learning cycle integrated with local wisdom. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i2.29956
[21]. Klemenčič, E., Ploj Virtič, M., & Majer Kovačič, J. (2023). The Role of Teacher Education in the Science Literacy Development. Athens Journal of Education, 10(4), 647–668. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.10-4-5
[22]. Sumanik, N. B., Nurvitasari, E., & Siregar, L. F. (2021). Analisis Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Calon Guru Pendidikan Kimia. Quantum: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 12(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v12i1.10215
[23]. Adriadi, A., Bestari, A. V., Suprayogi, D., Rayani, N. (2025). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek pada Mata Kuliah Biologi Konservasi. Biodik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 11(01), 158 – 169
[24]. Sartika, D., Kalsum, U. & Arsyad, A. A. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Sulawesi Barat. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 8-12
[25]. Siagian, G.S., Hidayat, P, Ichsan, Yuliarsih, T. (2025). Analisis Tingkat Literasi Sains Mahasiswa PGSD Dalam Konteks Pengembangan Kompetensi, Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10 (02), 323-335
[26]. Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): Measuring Undergraduates’ Evaluation of Scientific Information and Arguments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
[27]. Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
[28]. Hindun, I., Nurwidodo, N., Wahyuni, S., & Fauziah, N. (2024). Effectiveness of project-based learning in improving science literacy and collaborative skills of Muhammadiyah middle school students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 10(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.31628
[29]. Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
[30]. Pimentel, D. R. (2025). Learning to evaluate sources of science (mis)information on the internet: Assessing students’ scientific online reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 62(3), 684–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21974
[31]. Tarbiyati, R. & Riyadi, Y. (2025). The Role of Information Literacy in Improving Students' Abilities in the Digital Era. Formosa Journal of Science and Technology (FJST) 4(9). 2989-2998. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v4i9.226
[32]. Hendratmoko, A. F., Madlazim, M., Widodo, W. & Astutik, S. (20240 Debate Based on Inquiry Learning (DBOIL): An Innovative Learning Model to Improve Students’ Skills in Scientific Argumentation. TEM Journal. 13(4), 3295-3303. DOI: 10.18421/TEM134-64
[33]. Rind, Z. ul A. (2020). Challenges faced by students during conducting research: A review. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 4, 16–19. www.allsubjectjournal.com
[34]. Hämäläinen, E. K., Kiili, C., Räikkönen, E., & Marttunen, M. (2021). Students’ abilities to evaluate the credibility of online texts: The role of internet-specific epistemic justifications. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1409–1422. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12580
[35]. Marttunen, M., Salminen, T., & Utriainen, J. (2021). Student evaluations of the credibility and argumentation of online sources. Journal of Educational Research, 114(3), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1929052
[36]. van der Eem, M., van Drie, J., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Boxtel, C. (2022). Students’ evaluation of the trustworthiness of historical sources: Procedural knowledge and task value as predictors of student performance. The Journal of Social Studies Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2022.05.003
[37]. Wiyarsi, A., Çalik, M., Priyambodo, E., & Dina, D. (2024). Indonesian Prospective Teachers’ Scientific Habits of Mind:A Cross Grade Study in the Context of Local and Global Socio scientific Issues. Science & Education, 33(5), 1257–1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00429-4
[38]. Portillo-Blanco, A., Deprez, H., De Cock, M., Guisasola, J., & Zuza, K. (2024). A Systematic Literature Review of Integrated STEM Education: Uncovering Consensus and Diversity in Principles and Characteristics. Education Sciences, 14(9), 1028. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091028
[39]. Ariely, M., & Yarden, A. (2025). Promoting students’ critical evaluation of popular scientific articles: the influence of critical discussions using contradictory scientific texts of different genres. International Journal of Science Education, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2490778
[40]. Eliza, D., Mulyeni, T., Yulsyofriend, Mahyuddin, N., Erita, Y., & Dhanil, M. (2025). Implementation Of Project-Based Learning In Improving Scientific Literacy In Early Childhood Education: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 24(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/25.24.71
[41]. Nilyani, K., Asrizal, A., & Usmeldi, U. (2023). Effect of STEM Integrated Science Learning on Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking Skills of Students: A Meta-Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.2614
[42]. Saija, M., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., & Sumari. (2022). Enhancement Of High School Students’ Scientific Literacy Using Local-Socioscientific Issues In OE3C Instructional Strategies. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.33341
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
URN
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hanida Listiani, Ruth Megawati, Suriyah Satar, Cartika Candra Ledoh, Nurbaya Nurbaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. Authors are responsible for ensuring that any third-party materials included in their work have proper permissions.
