School Management Collaboration in Managing Student Potential in Nature Schools

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59211/mjpjetl.v4i1.179

Keywords:

management collaboration, student potential management, nature school, education management

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the patterns of school management collaboration in managing student potential at Sekolah Alam Kampung Sawah and Pesantren Alam Arrahmah Bondowoso. The inquiry focused on role distribution among school management actors, coordination mechanisms, student potential facilitation strategies, and supporting and inhibiting factors of collaboration. A qualitative approach with a multi-site case study design was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, limited participatory observation, and school documentation. Participants included principals, classroom teachers, supporting teachers, dormitory mentors, administrative staff, and parents. Data were analyzed through data condensation, data display, and thematic conclusion drawing. Trustworthiness was strengthened through source triangulation, technique triangulation, member checking, and document audits. The findings revealed that school management collaboration in managing student potential was enacted through coordination meetings, daily communication, individual assistance, outdoor learning adaptation, and student progress evaluation. Effective collaboration emerged when schools developed participatory leadership, a caring culture, cross-role communication, and consistent student development documentation. The main constraints were limited potential assessment instruments, teacher workload, and uneven understanding of holistic student potential management

Article Statistics
0
Abstract Views
0
Total Downloads
0
PDF Downloads
10
References
Jul 21, 2026
Published

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M. Friend and L. Cook, Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals, 8th ed. Pearson, 2017.

[2] U. Bronfenbrenner, The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press, 1979.

[3] M. Ainscow, “Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences,” Nord. J. Stud. Educ. Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2020, doi: 10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587.

[4] R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods, 6th ed. SAGE Publications, 2018.

[5] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 4th ed. SAGE Publications, 2018.

[6] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 3rd ed. Sage Publications, 2014.

[7] D. E. DeMatthews, A. Serafini, and T. N. Watson, “Leading inclusive schools: Principal perceptions, practices, and challenges to meaningful change,” Educ. Adm. Q., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 3–48, 2021, doi: 10.1177/0013161X20913897.

[8] L. Florian and K. Black-Hawkins, “Exploring inclusive pedagogy,” Br. Educ. Res. J., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 813–828, 2011, doi: 10.1080/01411926.2010.501096.

[9] U. Sharma and S. J. Salend, “Teaching assistants in inclusive classrooms: A systematic analysis of the international research,” Aust. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 118–134, 2016, doi: 10.14221/ajte.2016v41n8.7.

[10] K. Messiou, “Research in the field of inclusive education: Time for a rethink?,” Int. J. Incl. Educ., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 146–159, 2017, doi: 10.1080/13603116.2016.1223184.

Downloads

Published

21-07-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

URN

Similar Articles

31-40 of 70

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.