Teacher Collaboration in Integrative Curriculum Development at Nature-Based Schools

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59211/mjpjetl.v4i1.180

Keywords:

Teacher collaboration; Integrative curriculum; Nature-based school; Ecosystem factors; Systematic literature review

Abstract

Nature-based schools have grown rapidly worldwide, yet research on how teachers collaborate to develop integrative curricula within these settings—and what ecosystem factors shape such collaboration—remains limited. This study aimed to systematically synthesise existing literature on teacher collaboration in integrative curriculum development at nature-based schools, identify enabling and impeding ecosystem factors, and map current research gaps. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following the PRISMA protocol was conducted, screening 90 articles from four databases (ERIC, Google Scholar, Scispace, and Semantic Scholar) published between 2015 and 2026, from which 43 articles met all inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis revealed four main forms of teacher collaboration: curriculum co-planning and co-design, interdisciplinary team teaching, professional learning communities (PLC), and collaboration with external actors. Four ecosystem factor categories were identified as enablers and barriers: school leadership (the most determinant factor), school culture, educational policy, and the physical-community ecosystem of nature-based schools. Five critical research gaps were identified, notably the scarcity of studies in Asian and Indonesian contexts, the absence of integrative research simultaneously examining all three variables, and the lack of longitudinal studies. These findings indicate that effective teacher collaboration in nature-based schools requires distributed principal leadership, autonomy-supporting policies, and a systemic collaborative culture, with implications for school principals, policymakers, and researchers.

Article Statistics
0
Abstract Views
0
Total Downloads
0
PDF Downloads
37
References
Jul 21, 2026
Published

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] L. Green, “Teacher collaboration for student-centered project-based curriculum development in the supplementary school: What do teachers need?,” J. Jewish Educ., 2024, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1450638

[2] K. McGlynn, “Reframing curriculum collaboration: Using change laboratory methodology to reimagine initial teacher education partnerships,” Asia-Pacific J. Teach. Educ., 2026, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1500726

[3] J. Gruno and S. Gibbons, “Implementing nature-based physical activity in physical and health education teacher education,” J. Adventure Educ. Outdoor Learn., 2025, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1471751

[4] B. Ávalos-Bevan and F. MA, “School-based teacher collaboration in Chile and Portugal,” Comp. A J. Comp. Int. Educ., 2022, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1367719

[5] E. Foster, “Curriculum-based professional learning benefits students and teachers,” Learn. Prof., 2024, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1446861

[6] J. Holloway and L. Parcerisa, “Teacher collaboration: How conditions of accountability shape teachers’ autonomy, responsibilities, and relationships,” Teach. Teach. Theory Pract., 2025, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1499734

[7] T. Toikka and M. Tarnanen, “Understanding teachers’ mental models of collaboration to enhance the learning community,” Educ. Stud., 2024, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1445684

[8] Y. Karsantık, “A systematic review of curriculum leadership research,” Br. Educ. Res. J., 2026, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1499122

[9] F. Yalçın and E. FT, “Northern roots, eastern branches: Researching forest kindergarten practices in Türkiye,” Environ. Educ. Res., 2026, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1503364

[10] W. VA, A. LJ, and G. JMH, “Challenges and pedagogical conflicts for teacher-forest school leaders implementing forest school within the UK primary curriculum,” Educ. 3-13, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1377071

[11] D. ZF, “The strands of the forest school implementation challenges: A literature review,” Prism Cast. New Light Learn. Theory Pract., 2024, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1462839

[12] C. Speldewinde, “STEM teaching and learning in bush kinders,” Can. J. Sci. Math. Technol. Educ., 2022, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1344777

[13] R. EAC and N. Walshe, “Curriculum making and climate change and sustainability education: A case study of school teachers’ practices from England, UK,” Environ. Educ. Res., 2025, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1469082

[14] M. Harris, “Growing among trees: A 12-month process evaluation of school based outdoor learning interventions,” J. Adventure Educ. Outdoor Learn., 2023, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1391259

[15] S. Tolppanen, “A tool for planning multidisciplinary teacher collaboration and project-based learning,” Educ. Stud., 2024, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1437666

[16] E. Januardi, C. YM, and M. Syaifuddin, “Integration of learning beyond the classroom and project-based learning in a nature-based elementary school,” Mimb. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 418–435, 2025, doi: 10.53400/mimbar-sd.v12i3.89085.

[17] T. Suharto and S. MI, “The idea of ‘flipped curricula’ and letting students design their own classes: Learning from United Kingdom and Indonesian forest schools,” At-Tarbawi, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 30–49, 2025, doi: 10.22515/attarbawi.v10i1.11785.

[18] J. Haapaniemi, S. Venäläinen, A. Malin, and P. Palojoki, “Teacher autonomy and collaboration as part of integrative teaching: Reflections on the curriculum approach in Finland,” J. Curric. Stud., 2021, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1305818

[19] T. Hunter-Doniger, “Seeing the forest through the trees: At the intersection of forest kindergartens and art-based environmental education,” J. Adventure Educ. Outdoor Learn., 2021, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1321244

[20] S. Karppinen, “Outdoor education in a Finnish hospital school: Let’s open the doors and take a forest walk,” J. Outdoor Environ. Educ., 2022, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1336942

[21] C. Speldewinde, “Don’t pick, don’t lick: Connecting young children’s risky play in nature to science education in Australian bush kinders,” Early Child. Educ. J., 2025, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1462311

[22] I. AF and S. SM, “The integrative learning approach in early childhood: A proposed framework based on STEM,” Eur. J. STEM Educ., 2025, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1491304

[23] C. Speldewinde and C. Campbell, “Bush kinders: Building young children’s relationships with the environment,” Aust. J. Environ. Educ., 2024, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1436345

[24] A. Tunggal, H. Haeruddin, and A. Akhmad, “Kolaborasi kepala sekolah dan guru dalam manajemen kurikulum kontekstual,” J. Basicedu, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 881–890, 2025, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v9i4.10208.

[25] Madden and et al., “Reflection in action: Environmental education professional development with two cohorts,” Innov. Sci. Teach. Educ., 2021, [Online]. Available: https://innovations.theaste.org/index.php/iste/article/view/353

[26] Connolly and et al., “Fostering teacher agency: Insights from the DCU changemaker schools network,” Irish Educ. Stud., 2025, doi: 10.1080/03323315.2025.2453742.

[27] W. Chen, H. Pan, and S. Cheng, “From school leadership to classroom practice: The mediating roles of emotions and collaboration in curriculum reform,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., 2025, doi: 10.1177/17411432251401716.

[28] J. Hughes and K. Davis, “Strategic leadership for sustainable innovation in primary education: A case study of forest school integration,” Int. J. Educ. Manag., 2025, doi: 10.1108/ijem-05-2025-0369.

[29] M. Demirer, “Orman okullarinda ogretmen-yonetici isbirligi [Teacher-administrator collaboration in forest schools],” Zenodo, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15164608.

[30] I. Neville, P. LA, and F. Ben, “Cross disciplinary teaching: A pedagogical model to support teachers in the development and implementation of outdoor learning opportunities,” J. Outdoor Environ. Educ., vol. 26, pp. 1–21, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42322-022-00109-x.

[31] E. Oberle, M. Zeni, F. Munday, and M. Brussoni, “Support factors and barriers for outdoor learning in elementary schools: A systemic perspective,” Am. J. Heal. Educ., vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 251–265, 2021, doi: 10.1080/19325037.2021.1955232.

[32] T. Gryson, K. Strubbe, T. Valcke, and R. Vanderlinde, “Enhancing teachers’ interdisciplinary professional development through teacher design teams,” Educ. Sci., 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14040425.

[33] B. Garrett, “Embedding environment, sustainability and place into education through teacher-researcher collaborations,” Possibility Stud. Soc., 2025, doi: 10.1177/27538699251362294.

[34] L. Piersol, L. Russell, and J. Groves, “Nature education for sustainable todays and tomorrows (NEST): Hatching a new culture in schooling,” Aust. J. Environ. Educ., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 97–114, 2018, doi: 10.1017/AEE.2018.31.

[35] A. Filippaki, “Building a collective school culture to achieve education for sustainability,” Open J. Soc. Sci., vol. 11, no. 04, pp. 19–38, 2023, doi: 10.4236/jss.2023.114003.

[36] A. Agustina, R. Riswandi, and S. SR, “Systematic literature review: Teacher learning communities as a strategy for sustainable professional development in schools,” Ensiklopedia, vol. 5, no. 01, pp. 148–159, 2025, doi: 10.24967/esp.v5i01.4365.

[37] V. EI, L. Landi, A. Jornet, P. Damiani, and M. Esteban-Guitart, “School leadership dimensions that foster the development of learning ecosystems,” J. Prof. Cap. Community, 2025, doi: 10.1108/jpcc-05-2024-0066.

Downloads

Published

21-07-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

URN

Similar Articles

11-20 of 71

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.