Implementation of Technical Standard Operating Procedures in Teaching Factory for Developing Vocational High School Students’ Work Readiness in Accordance with Industry Standards
Studi kasus di SMK Canda Bhirawa Pare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59211/mjpjetl.v4i2.451Keywords:
Teaching factory, Standard operating procedure, work readiness, vocational education, vocational high school.Abstract
The gap between vocational high school (SMK) graduates' competencies and industry demands remains a structural challenge in Indonesian vocational education. This study aims to describe the effectiveness of implementing Technical Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) within the Teaching Factory (TEFA) program at SMK Canda Bhirawa Pare in developing students' work readiness in accordance with industry standards. A mixed method approach with a Sequential Explanatory design was employed, involving 40 respondents comprising TEFA students, supervising teachers, and alumni. Data were collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that the implementation of TEFA technical SOPs is highly effective with both primary variables classified under the highly effective category in fostering work discipline, responsibility, procedural compliance, and the internalization of industrial work culture among students. Convergent quantitative and qualitative data confirm that technical SOPs function not merely as operational guidelines, but as a systematic instructional instrument for developing students' professional character. This study concludes that the integration of industry-standard SOPs into TEFA programs substantially bridges the competency gap between SMK graduates and industry expectations, with practical implications for the sustainable development of Teaching Factory programs in vocational education.
Downloads
References
[1] D. S. Rifai, A. Ardiansyah, A. I. B. Yahya, and R. Fitriyani, “The Implementation of Teaching Factory in Vocational Education: A Systematic Review,” Jurnal VARIDIKA, pp. 48–64, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.23917/varidika.v38i1.13289.
[2] G. Kadek, S. Adnyana, K. Agustini, and K. Suartama, “Analisis Sistematis Model dan Implementasi Teaching Factory Dalam Pendidikan Vokasi Serta Dampaknya Terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Siswa SMK,” Jayapangus Press Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 8, no. 4, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://jayapanguspress.penerbit.org/index.php/cetta
[3] N. N. Hidayanti and M. Nuruddin, “Perancangan Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) proses produksi pada TEFA (Teaching Factory) (Studi Kasus: Smk Manbaul Ulum),” JUSTI, vol. 2, no. 2, 2022.
[4] C. L. Caballero, A. Walker, and M. Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, “Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability,” vol. 2, no. 2, p. 41, 2011, doi: 10.3316/informit.211178854275901.
[5] Y. Desia Putri and I. Reza Prima, “Peran Personality Traits terhadap Kesiapan Kerja melalui Learning Agility sebagai Mediator,” vol. 9, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.26858/talenta.v9i2.70775.
[6] E. Nuraeni, “Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Teaching Factory Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Mutu Lulusan Di SMK Letris Indonesia 2 Tangerang Selatan,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Indonesia, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1979–1689, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.52436/1.jpti.851.
[7] S. Y. Wulandari and S. N. Sulistyowati, “Pengaruh Teaching Factory Terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Siswa SMK Kota Jombang,” 2024.
[8] S. Arif, “Teaching Factory di SMK sebagai Pendekatan Pembelajaran Berbasis Industri dalam Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.pendidikanperintis.com/index.php/jurnalpendidikanprofesional
[9] M. Purwaningtias and M. R. Chamami, “Optimalisasi Model Pembelajaran Teaching Factory untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan Vokasi di SMK Islamic Centre Baiturrahman Semarang,” 2025.
[10] I. Nursanti and F. Purwanto, “IMPLEMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN TEACHING FACTORY DI PROGRAM KEAHLIAN TEKNIK MESIN DI SMK NEGERI 1 SINGOSARI,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.pendidikanperintis.com/index.php/jurnalpendidikanprofesional
[11] A. Setiadi, U. Rochayati, I. Hartopo, and T. Handito, “Production-based teaching factory learning model: Enhancing soft skills and simulating the industrial environment,” Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 278–292, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.59672/ijed.v6i2.4679.
[12] Sanatang, “Analisis Pengelolaan Teaching Factory di SMK Negeri 5 Makassar,” Jurnal MediaTIK: Jurnal Media Pendidikan Teknik Informatika dan Komputer, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 19–24, Sep. 2020.
[13] J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2018.
[14] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.
[15] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2018.
[16] Matthew B. Miles A. Michael Huberman Johnny Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2014.
[17] L. J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rokhmat Hidayatul Ghani Akbar Ghani AKbar, Saifuddin Karim Saifuddin Karim, Muhammad Risqy Sabil Arresa Muhammad Risqy Sabil Arresa, Dema Bintang Herlambang Dema Bintang Herlambang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. Authors are responsible for ensuring that any third-party materials included in their work have proper permissions.
